MI Test

Code: pbd2jz8tpn83144. View it yourself, I cant get the image good enough to be seen here.
Basically, Linguistic 17/25 (Sorry Mr Chen)
Logical 20
Interpersonal 21
Intrapersonal 19
Musical 20
Visual/Spatial 18
Naturalistic 19
Kinaesthetic 20.

The linguistic score is a bit low... but sort of expected, since I'm more of a math/science person. I'm not the kind who will actually like writing novels etc, although I like reading science fiction ones. Then again, I'm a debater so it should have been higher.

Interpersonal was a little high, I don't think my interpersonal skills are that good, but then the computer says so. I suppose that its right then, since there's no motive to change it?

Intrapersonal wasnt the best score ever, but its reasonable so no comment.

Musical is too high!!!! I dont have any qualifications in music except for a grade 1 violin, and none at all for piano. I dont even listen to music at home. No Viva la Vida or anything.

The rest are a little high. I've never considered myself a visualiser, or a naturalist, or a spoorty person. In fact, for my NAPFA test, I managed to fail it for four years straight. I dont exactly revere animals, and I cant visualise anything for half a nut.

I think this test is reasonably accurate, but is not totally reliable nor precise. I think it should be used just for the basic purpose of a rough gauge of our strengths and weaknesses, but not for comparisions. This si because the scoring is based on questions that may have been answered inaccurately, affecting the results.
Cheers
ccy